IASB DP/2020/1

  • For-profit

Business Combinations – Disclosures, Goodwill and Impairment

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has recently issued for comment DP/2020/1 Business CombinationsDisclosures, Goodwill and Impairment (the DP).

In issuing the DP, the IASB’s objective is to improve the information entities provide to investors, at a reasonable cost, about the acquisitions those companies make. Better information should help investors to more effectively hold an entity's management to account for its acquisition decisions.

The DP sets out the IASB’s preliminary views that the IASB should:

    1. improve disclosures about acquisitions – this could include introducing disclosure requirements for information about management’s objectives for acquisitions and how acquisitions have performed against those objectives;
    2. retain the impairment-only model for goodwill, rather than reintroducing amortisation of goodwill;
    3. provide relief from the mandatory annual impairment test of goodwill;
    4.  amend how value in use is estimated, to simplify the impairment test;
    5. require the presentation of total equity excluding goodwill on the balance sheet, and;
    6. retain the current requirements on the recognition of acquired intangible assets separately from goodwill.

The IASB also considered whether the impairment test could be made significantly more effective, at a reasonable cost to entities. The IASB’s preliminary view is that this is not feasible.

The IASB is seeking comments on whether:

  1. its suggested disclosure requirements for acquisitions would provide useful information and are feasible; and
  2. stakeholders have new evidence or new arguments on how companies should account for goodwill.

IASB Chair Hans Hoogervorst summarises the content of the DP in this brief video:

Have a look

While further consultation is expected before the IASB issues any new or amended standards on the matters considered in the DP, such consultation will be influenced by comments received on the DP.

The XRB Board is committed to adopting international standards in the for-profit sector. Generally, once a standard has been issued by the IASB, the NZASB then issues the New Zealand equivalent standard without further consultation.


Commenting on the Discussion Paper

This is your opportunity to comment on this DP.

Comments are due to the NZASB by 2 November 2020 and to the IASB by 31 December 2020

Send your comments—both formal and informal— to the NZASB using the upload form below. 

We also encourage you to send comments directly to the IASB, with a copy to the NZASB. Your comments can be made electronically to the IASB website by clicking on the following link https://www.ifrs.org/projects/open-for-comment/. First-time users must register with IASB to submit electronically.


Upload your submission here

Please use this secure online form.

It has been designed to make your upload safe, quick and easy. 

You can:

  • Upload an MS Word document (and a PDF file, if you wish); or
  • Write your comments below in the space provided.

You can upload up to TWO documents. 

Please note:

  • We would appreciate receiving a copy of your comments in electronic form (preferably Microsoft Word format).  This helps us to more efficiently collate and analyse comments. Please also specify the exposure draft number and title in your electronic file. 

  • Tell us on whose behalf you are making the comments (for example on behalf of a group or an entity).

  • We intend publishing all comments on the XRB website, unless they may be defamatory. If you have any objection to this, we will not publish them. However, they will remain subject to the Official Information Act 1982 and, therefore, may be released in part or in full. The Privacy Act 1993 also applies.

  • If you have an objection to the release of any information contained in your comments, we would appreciate you identifying the parts of your comments to be withheld, and the grounds under the Official Information Act 1982 for doing so (for example, that it would be likely to unfairly prejudice the commercial position of the person providing the information).