Audit Report 18-1

Not a Group Audit

  • For audits of entities that are not FMC reporting entities considered to have a higher level of public accountability.

  • Where the General Purpose Financial Report includes service performance information and entity information.

  • Where the auditor does not report Key Audit Matters.

  • Where NZ AS 1 (Revised) applies. 

Auditor's responsibilities for an audit of entity information, financial statements and service performance information arising from ISAs (NZ) and NZ AS 1 (Revised)  

As part of an audit in accordance with ISAs (NZ) and NZ AS 1 (Revised), the auditor exercises professional judgement and maintains professional scepticism throughout the audit.

The auditor also:

  • Identifies and assesses the risks of material misstatement of the entity information, financial statements and service performance information, whether due to fraud or error, designs and performs audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtains audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for the auditor’s opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
  • Obtains an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control.
  • Evaluates the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by management.
  • Obtains an understanding of the process applied by the entity to select its elements/aspects of service performance, performance measures and/or descriptions and the measurement bases or evaluation methods.
  • Evaluates whether the selection of elements/aspects of service performance, performance measures and/or descriptions and measurement bases or evaluation methods present an appropriate and meaningful assessment of the entity’s service performance in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.
  • Evaluates whether the service performance information is prepared in accordance with the entity’s measurement bases or evaluation methods, in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.
  • Concludes on the appropriateness of the use of the going concern basis of accounting by those charged with governance and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. If the auditor concludes that a material uncertainty exists, the auditor is required to draw attention in the auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify the auditor’s opinion. The auditor’s conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of the auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the entity to cease to continue as a going concern.
  • Evaluates the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, entity information and service performance information and whether the financial statements, entity information and service performance information represents the underlying transactions and events, and elements/aspects of service performance in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework, in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

The auditor communicates with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that the auditor identifies during the audit. 

Standards